Compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs Qin AI Phone

 
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392
Qin AI Phone
Add
Karbonn A7+
Karbonn A7+
Add
Micromax Bharat 1
Micromax Bharat 1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
84 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55Value For Money
Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 2.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 320 x 240 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 143 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- 34.19%   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- -   
Co-Processor
- -   
Processor Type
Single-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
512MB 256MB   
Graphics
- -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP -   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- -   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Camera Features
- -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- -   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen -   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, WiFi, 4G LTE (India Compatible), Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio), 2G   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Midnight Black, White, Wine Red White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.27W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.28W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
124 grams -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.50 x 63.10 x 10.85 -   
Height
- 132mm   
Width
- 53.8mm   
Thickness
- 8.5mm   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 512MB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM -   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
SIM 1 Bands
- 4G Bands:TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5)3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS:Available EDGE:Available   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- Yes   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 1480mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   
Standby Time
- Up to 420 Hours(4G)   
Talk Time
- Up to 15 Hours(4G)   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   
Loudspeaker
- Yes   

Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs Qin AI Phone Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392Qin AI Phone  
Screen Size 4 inch2.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP  
RAM 512MB256MB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh1480mAh  
Front Camera Resolution   

Qin AI Phone Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Runs on Android OS
  • Decent internals
  • Features a USB Type-C port
The Bad
This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 with Qin AI Phone. When you see Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 Vs Qin AI Phone comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 stands against Qin AI Phone and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated March 20, 2019.
Report an error on this page