Compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs Xolo Era X

Feature Comparison

  • Xolo Era X has 5 inch Screen Size and Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 has 4 inch Screen Size
  • Xolo Era X has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Xolo Era X's 2GB RAM is more than Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392's 512MB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392
Xolo Era X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
27 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Spreadtrum SC9830   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.50 x 63.10 x 10.85 145.50 x 72.00 x 8.45   
Weight
124 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.27W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.28W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 5.31GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 900 / 1800   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs Xolo Era X Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392Xolo Era X  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP8MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Xolo Era X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with Corning Gorilla Glass protection
  • Decent multitasking experience, thanks to the 2GB RAM
  • 4G LTE connectivity with VoLTE support
  • K-class amplifier and Box speakers enhance music experience
  • Soon to receive Android Marshmallow update
The Bad
  • Runs on Android 5.0 Lollipop out of the box
  • Only 8GB of internal storage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 with Xolo Era X. When you see Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 Vs Xolo Era X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 stands against Xolo Era X and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 is currently Rs. 9,610. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page