• hrs
  • mins

Compare Samsung Rex 80 S5222R vs Micromax Bolt A51

 
Samsung Rex 80 S5222R
Micromax Bolt A51
Add
Celkon A90
Celkon A90
Add
Nokia X2-01
Nokia X2-01
Show Only Differences
Rs. 5,280@Amazon
Add
Celkon A90
Add
Nokia X2-01
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
46VFM Score
50VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3 inch 3.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 480 x 320 pixels   
Screen Type
IPS LCD IPS LCD   
Pixel Density
133 PPI 164.8 PPI   
Refresh Rate
- -   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
47.14% -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Touch Screen
Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen -   
Color
Grey, Black, Red, White -   
Chipset     
Brand
- -   
Processor Speed
- 832MHz   
Processor
- -   
Co-Processor
- -   
Number of Cores
- -   
RAM
- 256MB   
Graphics
- -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Number of Rear Cameras
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
3.2MP 2MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
No. Of Selfie Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 1MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Pop-up Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- 1600x1200 Pixels   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Camera Features
- LED Flash   
Zoom
Yes, Digital Zoom -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
JAVA Proprietary Android (2.3)   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
Sensors
Proximity Sensor -   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.59W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.66W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
96 grams 118 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
102 x 58 x 11.5 118.5 x 62.5 x 12.8   
Height
102mm -   
Width
58mm -   
Thickness
11.5mm -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
20MB 1GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
16GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
Loudspeaker
- -   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Standard) SIM Mini (Standard) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Mini SIM -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Security
- -   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Connectivity
Bluetooth, WiFi, 2G 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
SIM 1 Bands
GPRS:Available EDGE:Available -   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
Yes -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Network     
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1000mAh 1500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   
Charge Time (20% - 100%)
- -   
Standby Time
Up to 625(2G) -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
Yes -   
Video Player
- -   

Samsung Rex 80 S5222R vs Micromax Bolt A51 Specs

Specs
Samsung Rex 80 S5222RMicromax Bolt A51  
Screen Size 3 inch3.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.2MP2MP  
RAM 256MB  
Battery Capacity 1000mAh1500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP  
This page helps you compare Samsung Rex 80 S5222R with Micromax Bolt A51. When you see Samsung Rex 80 S5222R Vs Micromax Bolt A51 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Rex 80 S5222R stands against Micromax Bolt A51 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Rex 80 S5222R is currently Rs. 5,280. The prices for both these products were updated August 8, 2020.
Home Blog About Us FAQs Contact Us Careers Terms of use Privacy Policy Electronics Specifications Feed
Mobile Recharge
100 Million Smiles & Counting

© 2012-2020 Pricebaba™ All rights reserved. All trademarks / logos / brands are the property of their respective owners.

Report an error on this page