• Speak now
  • Compare ▾
    • No products to compare!
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • My Account ▾
    • My Profile
    • My Dashboard
    • Logout

Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH vs Intex Aqua Supreme Plus

 
Compare Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH
Compare Intex Aqua Supreme Plus
Add
Intex Aqua Trend
Compare Intex Aqua Trend
Add
Panasonic T41 4GB
Compare Panasonic T41 4GB
Show Only Differences
Rs. 8,500@Amazon
Add
Intex Aqua Trend
Add
Panasonic T41 4GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52VFM Score
60VFM Score
  

Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH vs Intex Aqua Supreme Plus Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAHIntex Aqua Supreme Plus   
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch   
Processor MediaTek MT6737   
Internal Storage 4GB16GB   
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP   
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP   
Battery Capacity 1500mAh3000mAh   

Intex Aqua Supreme Plus Pros & Cons

Pros
  • Lightweight
  • Native language integration
Cons
  • Average overall performance for the price
  • Mediocre build quality
  • Camera on either sides could have been way better
This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH with Intex Aqua Supreme Plus. When you see Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH Vs Intex Aqua Supreme Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH stands against Intex Aqua Supreme Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Supreme Plus is Rs. 8,500. The prices for both these products were updated June 24, 2021.
Home Blog About Us FAQs Contact Us Careers Terms of use Privacy Policy Electronics Specifications Feed
Mobile RechargeDTH Recharge
100 Million Smiles & Counting

© 2012-2021 Pricebaba™ All rights reserved. All trademarks / logos / brands are the property of their respective owners.

Report an error on this page