Compare Samsung Z1 Tizen vs Lava A76 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Lava A76 Plus's Screen Size is 11.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Lava A76 Plus's is 50.0% more than Samsung Z1 Tizen
  • RAM of Lava A76 Plus's is 25.0% more than Samsung Z1 Tizen
 
Samsung Z1 Tizen
Lava A76 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
30 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52Value For Money
80Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD, PLS LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 207.32 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum -   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC7727S Spreadtrum SC9830A   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
768MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.1MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
120.4 x 63.2 x 9.7 134 x 66 x 9.3   
Weight
112 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Gold, Red Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for Phone and 6 months warranty for in the box accessories   
Body SAR
0.9W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.54W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.37GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM -   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 900 / 1800 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 900 / 2100MHz   
4G Bands
- TDD 40 / FDD3 / FDD5   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 1850mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Z1 Tizen vs Lava A76 Plus Specs

Specs
Samsung Z1 TizenLava A76 Plus  
Screen Size 4 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.1MP5MP  
RAM 768MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh1850mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Samsung Z1 Tizen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • New Tizen OS made by Samsung
The Bad
  • Below Average Camera
  • Not a lot of Apps available for Tizen
  • 4GB of Internal Memory is insufficient

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Z1 Tizen with Lava A76 Plus. When you see Samsung Z1 Tizen Vs Lava A76 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Z1 Tizen stands against Lava A76 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Z1 Tizen is currently Rs. 5,500. The lowest price for Lava A76 Plus is Rs. 3,999. The prices for both these products were updated January 17, 2018.
Report an error on this page