Compare Sony Xperia C vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)

Feature Comparison

  • HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)'s got 3.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)'s is 75.0% more than Sony Xperia C
  • HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) has 50.0% more RAM
 
Sony Xperia C
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
41 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 569 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, HDR Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141.5 x 74.2 x 8.9 150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61   
Weight
153 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Silver, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2390mAh 2840mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Sony Xperia C vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia CHTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2390mAh2840mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP2MP  

Sony Xperia C Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The power button is very well placed and easily accessible
  • Lasting battery backup
  • Support for Dual SIM as well as a separate slot for MicroSD card
The Bad
  • No HD display
  • Poor performance with plenty of lags
  • Below par camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia C with HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB). When you see Sony Xperia C Vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia C stands against HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) is Rs. 20,199. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page