• Speak now
  • Compare ▾
    • No products to compare!
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • My Account ▾

Compare Sony Xperia E dual vs Micromax Canvas Viva A72

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Canvas Viva A72's is 30.0% more than Sony Xperia E dual
  • Sony Xperia E dual's Internal Storage is 97.0% more
  • Get an email every time the price drops of any of these products
      Set Alert
    Invalid Email ID
    Great! Don't forget to click the confirmation link sent to your email.
 
Sony Xperia E dual
Micromax Canvas Viva A72
Add
Karbonn A7+
Karbonn A7+
Add
Intex Cloud Y2
Intex Cloud Y2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
67 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53Value For Money
48Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
164.8 PPI 186.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm MSM7227A -   
Processor Type
Single-Core -   
RAM
512MB -   
Graphics
Adreno 200 -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 3.15MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
- -   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
2048x1536 Pixels, Geo-Tagging, White balance settings, Self timer, Exposure compensation, Scene mode 2048x1536 Pixels   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording -   
Camera Features
- -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) Android (2.3)   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
115 grams 186 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
113.5 x 61.8 x 11 142.8 x 76 x 10.6   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 110MB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1530mAh -   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   
Loudspeaker
- -   

Sony Xperia E dual vs Micromax Canvas Viva A72 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia E dualMicromax Canvas Viva A72  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP3.15MP  
RAM 512MB  
Battery Capacity 1530mAh  
Front Camera Resolution   
This page helps you compare Sony Xperia E dual with Micromax Canvas Viva A72. When you see Sony Xperia E dual Vs Micromax Canvas Viva A72 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia E dual stands against Micromax Canvas Viva A72 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2018.
Report an error on this page