Compare Sony Xperia E3 Dual vs Samsung Galaxy J Max

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy J Max has 7 inch Screen Size and Sony Xperia E3 Dual has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy J Max has 8GB Internal Storage and Sony Xperia E3 Dual has 4GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy J Max's is 33.0% more than Sony Xperia E3 Dual
 
Sony Xperia E3 Dual
Samsung Galaxy J Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
89 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 7 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 800 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
218 PPI 216 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Spreadtrum SC8830   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Digital zoom, Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Digital Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama, Self-timer Digital Zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.1 x 69.4 x 8.5 186.9 x 108.8 x 8.7   
Weight
144 grams 289 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.742W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.833W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, Cover Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.73GB 3.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 200GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2330mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Sony Xperia E3 Dual vs Samsung Galaxy J Max Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia E3 DualSamsung Galaxy J Max  
Screen Size 4.5 inch7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 2330mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia E3 Dual with Samsung Galaxy J Max. When you see Sony Xperia E3 Dual Vs Samsung Galaxy J Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia E3 Dual stands against Samsung Galaxy J Max and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J Max is Rs. 11,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page