Compare Sony Xperia J vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 has 14.0% more Screen Size
  • The Micromax Canvas Selfie A255's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 75.0% more
  • Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 has 2GB RAM, whereas Sony Xperia J has 512MB RAM
 
Sony Xperia J
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
26 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.9 PPI 312.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm MSM7227A MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 200 Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Digital Image Stabilization, Digital zoom -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.1 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124.3 x 61.2 x 9.2 146.3 x 67.3 x 9.65   
Weight
124 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Angelic White, Mystic Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 12.14GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Sony Xperia J vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia JMicromax Canvas Selfie A255  
Screen Size 4 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP13MP  

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing flash for low light selfie and selfie lovers
  • Crisp display at 312PPI with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Quite old Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Mediocre performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia J with Micromax Canvas Selfie A255. When you see Sony Xperia J Vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia J stands against Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is Rs. 6,299. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page