Compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 has 4 inch Screen Size
  • HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Both Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 and HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim have same RAM
 
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
80 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.9 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face detectionTouch Focus, Digital Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama, Digital zoom Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 62 x 9.3 156.6 x 78.7 x 7.9   
Weight
115 grams 158 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.3W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.84W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
Dolby Atmos Audio -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 with HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim. When you see Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 Vs HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 stands against HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page