Compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs HTC Desire 826X

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 826X's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 27.0% more
  • HTC Desire 826X has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • HTC Desire 826X's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004
HTC Desire 826X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
60 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.9 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face detectionTouch Focus, Digital Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama, Digital zoom Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital Image Stabilization, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD video and Image Recording, Touch to Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 62 x 9.3 158 x 77.5 x 8   
Weight
115 grams 183 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Blue Lagoon, White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
1.3W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.84W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
Dolby Atmos Audio -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs HTC Desire 826X Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004HTC Desire 826X  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP13MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 with HTC Desire 826X. When you see Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 Vs HTC Desire 826X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 stands against HTC Desire 826X and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page