Compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs Lenovo Phab

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Phab has 6.98 inch Screen Size and Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 has 4 inch Screen Size
  • Lenovo Phab's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004's 4GB Internal Storage
  • Lenovo Phab has 2GB RAM, whereas Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 has 1GB RAM
 
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004
Lenovo Phab
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
97 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 6.98 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.9 PPI 210.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face detectionTouch Focus, Digital Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama, Digital zoom -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 62 x 9.3 186 x 97 x 8.9   
Weight
115 grams 250 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Tuxedo Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.3W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.84W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
Dolby Atmos Audio -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 23.91GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 4250mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 vs Lenovo Phab Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004Lenovo Phab  
Screen Size 4 inch6.98 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh4250mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge display gives a great multimedia experience
  • Great battery life with 4250mAh unit
  • 4G LTE enabled
  • Expandable storage up to 64GB
The Bad
  • Below average display quality with just 210PPI
  • Mediocre performance with a chipset for budget devices
  • Not that great camera output
  • Huge size for comfortable usage as a mobile device

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 with Lenovo Phab. When you see Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 Vs Lenovo Phab comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia M Dual Sim C2004 stands against Lenovo Phab and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page