Compare Sony Xperia M2 Aqua vs Vivo Y21

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Sony Xperia M2 Aqua's is 6.0% more than Vivo Y21
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Vivo Y21 is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Sony Xperia M2 Aqua is the same as Vivo Y21
 
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
Vivo Y21
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
51 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
51 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
229 PPI 218 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6580   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Digital zoom, White balance settings, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Digital image stabilization, Panorama, Continuous shooting, ISO settings, Self timer Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR, HD Recording (720p), 30 Frames per second (fps)   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Funtouch OS 2.1   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.1 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
IP68 (Dust and Water Resistant - 1.5 meters for 30 minutes) -   
Dimensions (mm)
140 x 72 x 8.6 130.7 x 66.4 x 9.2   
Weight
149 grams 157 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Copper, Black White, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.6GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - D2403 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 1900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Sony Xperia M2 Aqua vs Vivo Y21 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia M2 AquaVivo Y21  
Screen Size 4.8 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh1900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia M2 Aqua with Vivo Y21. When you see Sony Xperia M2 Aqua Vs Vivo Y21 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia M2 Aqua stands against Vivo Y21 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y21 is Rs. 7,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page