Compare Sony Xperia U vs Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen

Feature Comparison

  • The Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen has 5 inch Screen Size, which is 30.0% more
  • Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen's RAM is 75.0% more
 
Sony Xperia U
Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
24 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
279.9 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
NovaThor U8500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, 3D Sweep Panorama, Image Stabilization Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (2.3) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
112 x 54 x 12 141.5 x 70.7 x 11   
Weight
110 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Black, White   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.07W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.91W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1320mAh 2470mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Sony Xperia U vs Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia UMotorola Moto G 3rd Gen  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1320mAh2470mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good HD display and Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Near Stock UI experience and faster Android updates
  • Water Resistant IP67 rating
  • 4G and VoLTE Support
  • Improved 13MP camera
The Bad
  • Average battery capacity at 2470mAh
  • No Full HD display
  • No notification LED
  • No USB cable supplied with the device

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia U with Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen. When you see Sony Xperia U Vs Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia U stands against Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page