Compare Spice Stellar Mi-362 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Spice Stellar Mi-362 has 3.5 inch Screen Size
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)'s 16GB Internal Storage is more than Spice Stellar Mi-362's 2GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)'s is 87.0% more than Spice Stellar Mi-362
 
Spice Stellar Mi-362
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
15 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
45 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
164.8 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 650   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Hexa-Core   
RAM
256MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
2MP 16MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
1.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 150 x 76 x 9   
Weight
- 164 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Silver, Grey, Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
2GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12.48GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1300mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Fast Charging   

Spice Stellar Mi-362 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) Specs

Specs
Spice Stellar Mi-362Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 2MP16MP  
RAM 256MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1300mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.3MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Powerful Processor bundled with 2GB of RAM
  • Well calibrated, Crisp, Full HD Display
  • Fingerprint scanner makes it convenient to lock phone and apps
  • Good battery life (4050mAh) and Quick Charging
  • Well Built Metal Unibody
The Bad
  • MIUI may not be to everyone's liking
  • Flash Sale model makes it extremely hard to buy this phone

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Spice Stellar Mi-362 with Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB). When you see Spice Stellar Mi-362 Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Spice Stellar Mi-362 stands against Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Spice Stellar Mi-362 is currently Rs. 10,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page