Compare Swipe Elite Max vs Gionee X1

Feature Comparison

  • Swipe Elite Max has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Swipe Elite Max's 32GB Internal Storage is more than Gionee X1's 16GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Swipe Elite Max is 50.0% more
 
Swipe Elite Max
Gionee X1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
76 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
4GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 505 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- Amigo 4.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
155 x 76.6 x 7.7 144.3 x 72.2 x 8.8   
Weight
- 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold, Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.172W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.774W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- W-CDMA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600, LTE-TDD 1900 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Swipe Elite Max vs Gionee X1 Specs

Specs
Swipe Elite MaxGionee X1  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 4GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

Swipe Elite Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality & design
  • Decent performance, thanks to 4GB RAM
  • VoLTE (Relaince Jio) supported
The Bad
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Rear camera output is just average
  • Battery life could have been better

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Swipe Elite Max with Gionee X1. When you see Swipe Elite Max Vs Gionee X1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Swipe Elite Max stands against Gionee X1 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Gionee X1 is Rs. 8,099. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page