Compare Vivo V1 Max vs Lenovo Phab 2

Feature Comparison

  • The Lenovo Phab 2's got 6.4 inch Screen Size, while Vivo V1 Max's Screen Size is 5.5 inch
  • Lenovo Phab 2's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • Lenovo Phab 2's got 33.0% more RAM
 
Vivo V1 Max
Lenovo Phab 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
86 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 229 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT8735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Continuos Shooting, Exposure compensation, Face detection, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Self-timer, Touch to focus, White balance prese Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
154 x 77 x 6.8 175 x 89.5 x 5.5   
Weight
165 grams 225 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.97W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.34W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.62GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes, (Uses SIM2 slot)   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / TD-LTE 2300 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2720mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Vivo V1 Max vs Lenovo Phab 2 Specs

Specs
Vivo V1 MaxLenovo Phab 2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2720mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo V1 Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD display
  • 4G LTE support
  • Slim design
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version

Lenovo Phab 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy & classy build quality
The Bad
  • Low pixel density
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • Mediocre camera

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo V1 Max with Lenovo Phab 2. When you see Vivo V1 Max Vs Lenovo Phab 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo V1 Max stands against Lenovo Phab 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo V1 Max is currently Rs. 13,290. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page