Compare Vivo V1 vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Both Vivo V1 and Intex Aqua Ace 4G have same Screen Size
  • Both Vivo V1 and Intex Aqua Ace 4G have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Intex Aqua Ace 4G's is 33.0% more than Vivo V1
 
Vivo V1
Intex Aqua Ace 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
72 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Night Mode, HDR, Panorama Mode Add Face Detection, Gesture Capture, Take Photo While Recording, Voice Capture,Panorama, Mira Vision   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.3 × 71 × 6.78 145 x 71.5 x 6.7   
Weight
145 grams 122 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, White White, Black   
Build Material
- Glass, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.34W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.53W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 10.01GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 / TD-LTE 2300 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Vivo V1 vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G Specs

Specs
Vivo V1Intex Aqua Ace 4G  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Intex Aqua Ace 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for excellent multitasking experience
  • Support 4G LTE network in India
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Not that great processor performance
  • Android Lollipop is a slight disappointment in Marshmallow era

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo V1 with Intex Aqua Ace 4G. When you see Vivo V1 Vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo V1 stands against Intex Aqua Ace 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo V1 is currently Rs. 15,300. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Ace 4G is Rs. 9,899. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page