Compare Vivo Xshot X710 vs HTC Desire 820s

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 820s has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Vivo Xshot X710 has 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • Both Vivo Xshot X710 and HTC Desire 820s have same Internal Storage
  • Both Vivo Xshot X710 and HTC Desire 820s have same RAM
 
Vivo Xshot X710
HTC Desire 820s
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
78 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
57 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.26GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6752   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T760 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
[email protected], [email protected], Geo-tagging, touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR Auto Focus, BSI Sensor, Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.3) Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.45 x 73.3 x 7.99 157.70 x 78.74 x 7.74   
Weight
148 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, White-Orange, Milky Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.33W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.47W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
8.83GB 12.13GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Vivo Xshot X710 vs HTC Desire 820s Specs

Specs
Vivo Xshot X710HTC Desire 820s  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

HTC Desire 820s Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing Stereo Speakers
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Average display sharpness

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Xshot X710 with HTC Desire 820s. When you see Vivo Xshot X710 Vs HTC Desire 820s comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Xshot X710 stands against HTC Desire 820s and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo Xshot X710 is currently Rs. 9,890. The lowest price for HTC Desire 820s is Rs. 17,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page