Compare Vivo Xshot X710 vs Intex Aqua S7

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo Xshot X710's Screen Size is 3.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Vivo Xshot X710 is the same as Intex Aqua S7
  • Intex Aqua S7 has 33.0% more RAM
 
Vivo Xshot X710
Intex Aqua S7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
53 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail X Glass   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.26GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
[email protected], [email protected], Geo-tagging, touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR PIP mode, panorama mode, slow motion video,gesture shot, smile detection   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.3) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.45 x 73.3 x 7.99 142.50 x 72.50 x 8.70   
Weight
148 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Champagne, Dark Blue, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.33W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.47W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
8.83GB 10GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Vivo Xshot X710 vs Intex Aqua S7 Specs

Specs
Vivo Xshot X710Intex Aqua S7  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Intex Aqua S7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid display
  • Good build quality and design
  • Battery life is quite good
  • Ships with Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Average overall performance from the device
  • Tons of bloatware pre-installed
  • Output from either of the cameras is not great

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Xshot X710 with Intex Aqua S7. When you see Vivo Xshot X710 Vs Intex Aqua S7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Xshot X710 stands against Intex Aqua S7 and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo Xshot X710 is currently Rs. 9,890. The lowest price for Intex Aqua S7 is Rs. 8,790. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page