Compare Vivo Y21 vs Gionee P7

Feature Comparison

  • Gionee P7 has 10.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Vivo Y21 is the same as Gionee P7
  • Gionee P7's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Vivo Y21
Gionee P7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
39 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
218 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR, HD Recording (720p), 30 Frames per second (fps) Face Beauty, HDR, Digital zoom, Night Mode, ISO settings, Panorama, Face detection, Professional, White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Time-Lapse, Smart Scene, Text Recognition, GIF, PicNote, Smart Scan, Mood Photo, Self timer, Scene mode, Geo tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation,   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Funtouch OS 2.1 Amigo 3.2   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
130.7 x 66.4 x 9.2 -   
Weight
157 grams 167 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray White, LATTE GOLD, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.6GB 9GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Vivo Y21 vs Gionee P7 Specs

Specs
Vivo Y21Gionee P7  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y21 with Gionee P7. When you see Vivo Y21 Vs Gionee P7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y21 stands against Gionee P7 and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo Y21 is currently Rs. 7,000. The lowest price for Gionee P7 is Rs. 7,680. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page