Compare Vivo Y28 vs Gionee X1

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee X1's is 5.0% more than Vivo Y28
  • Gionee X1 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Gionee X1 has 2GB RAM, whereas Vivo Y28 has 1GB RAM
 
Vivo Y28
Gionee X1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
45 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
234.4 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Face Beauty, Panorama mode Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Amigo 4.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.37 x 68.57 x 9.78 144.3 x 72.2 x 8.8   
Weight
156 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Blue Gold, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.172W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.774W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.33GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 W-CDMA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600, LTE-TDD 1900 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Vivo Y28 vs Gionee X1 Specs

Specs
Vivo Y28Gionee X1  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Vivo Y28 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Some neat software tricks like Smart Wake and Super Screenshot
  • User removable battery and the back panel
The Bad
  • No Dual SIM
  • No 4G LTE connectivity
  • Lack of HD display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y28 with Gionee X1. When you see Vivo Y28 Vs Gionee X1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y28 stands against Gionee X1 and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo Y28 is currently Rs. 10,990. The lowest price for Gionee X1 is Rs. 8,099. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page