Compare Vivo Y31 vs Panasonic Eluga Arc

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Vivo Y31 is the same as Panasonic Eluga Arc
  • Panasonic Eluga Arc has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Panasonic Eluga Arc's got 2GB RAM, while Vivo Y31's RAM is 1GB
 
Vivo Y31
Panasonic Eluga Arc
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
36 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 312 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.24 × 68.76 × 8.39 139 x 67 x 8.1   
Weight
133 grams 130 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 1800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) -   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No Yes, Qualcomm Fast charging   

Vivo Y31 vs Panasonic Eluga Arc Specs

Specs
Vivo Y31Panasonic Eluga Arc  
Screen Size 4.7 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh1800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Vivo Y31 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Interesting smart gestures in built
  • Good compact design for single handed usage
The Bad
  • Poor battery backup
  • Settings app is confusing with no real shortcuts available
  • Below average camera

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y31 with Panasonic Eluga Arc. When you see Vivo Y31 Vs Panasonic Eluga Arc comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y31 stands against Panasonic Eluga Arc and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Arc is Rs. 7,649. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page