Compare Vivo Y51L vs Lava X81

Feature Comparison

  • Both Vivo Y51L and Lava X81 have same Screen Size
  • Both Vivo Y51L and Lava X81 have same Internal Storage
  • Lava X81 has 3GB RAM and Vivo Y51L has 2GB RAM
 
Vivo Y51L
Lava X81
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
53 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.29 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
FunTouch OS 2.5 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.80 x 71.70 x 7.52 142.6 x 73.4 x 8.4   
Weight
157 grams 141 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Space Gray, Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.86GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 GSM 900/1800 MHz   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900 900, 2100MHz HSPA+ (3G)   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300, FD-LTE 1800 LTE 800, 1800 MHz FDD, 2300 MHz TDD,Data: Cat 4, DL   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2350mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Vivo Y51L vs Lava X81 Specs

Specs
Vivo Y51LLava X81  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2350mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Vivo Y51L Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Processor and RAM combination delivers average performance
The Bad
  • Poor Resolution, Small battery

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Vivo Y51L with Lava X81. When you see Vivo Y51L Vs Lava X81 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Vivo Y51L stands against Lava X81 and which one you should buy. The best price of Vivo Y51L is currently Rs. 9,700. The lowest price for Lava X81 is Rs. 7,799. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page