Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) vs Kodak Ektra

Feature Comparison

  • The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)'s Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 9.0% more
  • Kodak Ektra has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Kodak Ektra's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)
Kodak Ektra
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
72 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
59 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 441 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 2.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MediaTek MT6797 Helio x20   
Processor Type
Hexa-Core Deca-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 21MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Optical Image Stabilization, Aperture f2.0, HDR Imaging   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF)   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
MIUI 7 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
150 x 76 x 9 147.80 x 73.35 x 9.69   
Weight
164 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Grey, Gold Black   
Build Material
Metal Unibody -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.48GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
Yes, Fast Charging -   

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) vs Kodak Ektra Specs

Specs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB)Kodak Ektra  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP21MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Powerful Processor bundled with 2GB of RAM
  • Well calibrated, Crisp, Full HD Display
  • Fingerprint scanner makes it convenient to lock phone and apps
  • Good battery life (4050mAh) and Quick Charging
  • Well Built Metal Unibody
The Bad
  • MIUI may not be to everyone's liking
  • Flash Sale model makes it extremely hard to buy this phone

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) with Kodak Ektra. When you see Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) Vs Kodak Ektra comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (16GB) stands against Kodak Ektra and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page