Compare Xolo A1000s vs Meizu M5

Feature Comparison

  • The Meizu M5's got 5.2 inch Screen Size, while Xolo A1000s's Screen Size is 5 inch
  • Meizu M5 has 16GB Internal Storage and Xolo A1000s has 4GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Meizu M5 is 50.0% more
 
Xolo A1000s
Meizu M5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
33 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
195.9 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MPGX6650 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Scene Detection & Tuning, Face Recognition, Panorama, Geo Tagging, Best Shot, Smile Shot, HDR Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touchfocus, Face detection, White balance setting, ISO setting, Exposure compensation, self-timer, scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) Flyme OS 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
128 x 63 x 8.98 147.28 × 72.8 × 8.15   
Weight
- 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Blue, Matte Black, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.71W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.89W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3070mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Xolo A1000s vs Meizu M5 Specs

Specs
Xolo A1000sMeizu M5  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3070mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo A1000s with Meizu M5. When you see Xolo A1000s Vs Meizu M5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo A1000s stands against Meizu M5 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Meizu M5 is Rs. 7,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page