Compare Xolo A600 vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM

Feature Comparison

  • The Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM's Screen Size measures in at 5.7 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 21.0% more
  • The Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM's got 8GB Internal Storage, while Xolo A600's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM's RAM measures in at 1GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Xolo A600
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
56 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
50 Value For Money Score
54 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 257.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Panorama Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Rich Capture   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Windows Phone 8.1   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
136 x 67 x 9 157.9 x 81.5 x 9   
Weight
125 grams 171 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Orange, Matte Cyan, Black, Glossy White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo A600 vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM Specs

Specs
Xolo A600Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Great battery life
  • Both cameras perform well
The Bad
  • Huge size makes it tough to hold
  • Poor pixel density robs the viewing experience
  • Windows App Store has very few apps
  • 8GB of internal storage may feel less

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo A600 with Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM. When you see Xolo A600 Vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo A600 stands against Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Dual SIM is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page