Compare Xolo Black 1X vs LYF Water 9

Feature Comparison

  • LYF Water 9's Screen Size is 9.0% more
  • Xolo Black 1X has 32GB Internal Storage and LYF Water 9 has 8GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Xolo Black 1X is 66.0% more
 
Xolo Black 1X
LYF Water 9
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
80 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 400.53 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Geotagging, Autofocus, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.6 x 72 x 7.6 144 x 70.7 x 7.7   
Weight
125 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
0.14W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.09W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25.46GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE 1800 TD-LTE 2300 -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2400mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo Black 1X vs LYF Water 9 Specs

Specs
Xolo Black 1XLYF Water 9  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 3GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2400mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Xolo Black 1X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 3GB RAM ensures that the overall performance of the device is snappy
  • Display offers good and vibrant colours
  • The phone feels solidly built despite its light weight
The Bad
  • Camera performance in challenging lighting is poor
  • Battery life does not last one full day
  • Speakers are quite muted

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Black 1X with LYF Water 9. When you see Xolo Black 1X Vs LYF Water 9 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Black 1X stands against LYF Water 9 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Black 1X is currently Rs. 7,957. The lowest price for LYF Water 9 is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page