Compare Xolo Black vs Samsung Galaxy J Max

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy J Max has 7 inch Screen Size and Xolo Black has 5.5 inch Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Xolo Black is 50.0% more
  • The Xolo Black has 2GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
Xolo Black
Samsung Galaxy J Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
46 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 800 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 216 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Spreadtrum SC8830   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
Yes, 2MP No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
HDR, Red eye, Geo tagging removal, Panorama capture, Zero Shutter Lag, Supports Ubifocus, ChromaFlash Optizoom Digital Zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
155.5 x 76.6 x 7.3 186.9 x 108.8 x 8.7   
Weight
- 289 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.27W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.13W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 3.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 200GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
LTE 1800 TD-LTE 2300 LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3200mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
Yes, Qualcomm Quick Charge 1.0 No   

Xolo Black vs Samsung Galaxy J Max Specs

Specs
Xolo BlackSamsung Galaxy J Max  
Screen Size 5.5 inch7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 3200mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Black with Samsung Galaxy J Max. When you see Xolo Black Vs Samsung Galaxy J Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Black stands against Samsung Galaxy J Max and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Black is currently Rs. 11,936. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J Max is Rs. 11,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page