Compare Xolo Era 4G vs Yu Yunique Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Xolo Era 4G has 5 inch Screen Size, whereas Yu Yunique Plus has 4.7 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Xolo Era 4G is the same as Yu Yunique Plus
  • The Yu Yunique Plus's RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Xolo Era 4G
Yu Yunique Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
67 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 312 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9830 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
145.5 x 72 x 8.45 134.5 x 67.5 x 8.3   
Weight
142 grams 128 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.23W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.26W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.52GB 4.61GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Xolo Era 4G vs Yu Yunique Plus Specs

Specs
Xolo Era 4GYu Yunique Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Xolo Era 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Corning Gorilla Glass protection
  • Decent battery backup
  • 4G support with VoLTE capability
  • Expandable storage up to 32GB via a MicroSD card
The Bad
  • Below average camera quality
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Average performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Era 4G with Yu Yunique Plus. When you see Xolo Era 4G Vs Yu Yunique Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Era 4G stands against Yu Yunique Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Era 4G is currently Rs. 4,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page