Compare Xolo LT2000 vs Lenovo Vibe K4 Note

Feature Comparison

  • Both Xolo LT2000 and Lenovo Vibe K4 Note have same Screen Size
  • The Lenovo Vibe K4 Note's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Xolo LT2000's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • The RAM on Lenovo Vibe K4 Note is 66.0% more
 
Xolo LT2000
Lenovo Vibe K4 Note
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
37 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
115 x 74.8 x 7.8 153.6 x 76.5 x 9.2   
Weight
- 158 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, White   
Build Material
- Metal, Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.3W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.28W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.63GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2920mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo LT2000 vs Lenovo Vibe K4 Note Specs

Specs
Xolo LT2000Lenovo Vibe K4 Note  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2920mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Lenovo Vibe K4 Note Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good Quality Display
  • Good Multimedia Performance with Stereo Speakers & Dolby Atmos support
  • VR-compatible
  • Thoughtful Customisations by Lenovo including built-in Stock Android Launcher
  • Quick Fingerprint Scanner
The Bad
  • Unsatisfactory rear camera performance
  • Build Quality not Best-in-Class
  • Mediocre Gaming Performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo LT2000 with Lenovo Vibe K4 Note. When you see Xolo LT2000 Vs Lenovo Vibe K4 Note comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo LT2000 stands against Lenovo Vibe K4 Note and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe K4 Note is Rs. 16,565. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page