Compare Xolo Play 8X-1200 vs Panasonic Eluga A2

Feature Comparison

  • Both Xolo Play 8X-1200 and Panasonic Eluga A2 have same Screen Size
  • Xolo Play 8X-1200 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Panasonic Eluga A2's got 33.0% more RAM
 
Xolo Play 8X-1200
Panasonic Eluga A2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
64 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592T MediaTek MT6735M   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
PureCel Sensor, Scene Detection & Tuning, High Dynamic Range (HDR), Low Light Enhancement, (For Focussing as well as in Gallery), Vertical & Horizonta Geo tagging, Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, ISO settings, Digital image Stabilization, HDR, Face Detection, Panorama, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, Touch to Focus, Scene mode, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Exposure compensation   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 68.5 x 9.7 143.80 x 72.00 x 8.90   
Weight
- 167.5 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold, Metallic Silver   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.68GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 UMTS 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No Yes   

Xolo Play 8X-1200 vs Panasonic Eluga A2 Specs

Specs
Xolo Play 8X-1200Panasonic Eluga A2  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Play 8X-1200 with Panasonic Eluga A2. When you see Xolo Play 8X-1200 Vs Panasonic Eluga A2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Play 8X-1200 stands against Panasonic Eluga A2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Play 8X-1200 is currently Rs. 12,999. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga A2 is Rs. 7,178. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page