Compare Xolo Play 8X-1200 vs Samsung Galaxy E5

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Xolo Play 8X-1200 is the same as Samsung Galaxy E5
  • Internal Storage of Xolo Play 8X-1200's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy E5
  • RAM of Xolo Play 8X-1200's is 25.0% more than Samsung Galaxy E5
 
Xolo Play 8X-1200
Samsung Galaxy E5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
86 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
59 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592T Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
PureCel Sensor, Scene Detection & Tuning, High Dynamic Range (HDR), Low Light Enhancement, (For Focussing as well as in Gallery), Vertical & Horizonta Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 68.5 x 9.7 141.6 x 70.2 x 7.3   
Weight
- 120 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, White, Brown   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.87W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 64GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Xolo Play 8X-1200 vs Samsung Galaxy E5 Specs

Specs
Xolo Play 8X-1200Samsung Galaxy E5  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy E5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED and well calibrated display
  • Decent battery life that should last through the day
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance
  • Quite an outdated Android version

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Play 8X-1200 with Samsung Galaxy E5. When you see Xolo Play 8X-1200 Vs Samsung Galaxy E5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Play 8X-1200 stands against Samsung Galaxy E5 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Play 8X-1200 is currently Rs. 12,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy E5 is Rs. 15,480. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page