Compare Xolo Prime vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB

Feature Comparison

  • The Xolo Era 2X 3GB has 5 inch Screen Size, which is 10.0% more
  • Xolo Era 2X 3GB has 16GB Internal Storage and Xolo Prime has 8GB Internal Storage
  • The Xolo Era 2X 3GB's got 3GB RAM, while Xolo Prime's RAM is 1GB
 
Xolo Prime
Xolo Era 2X 3GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
46 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582M MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Auto Focus Rear Camera with 5P Largan Lens, F2.0, Blue Glass Filter, Face Beauty, HDR, Panorama, Gesture Recognition, Voice Capture, Smile Shot, Face Detection, Self Timer, Time Lapse Video   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
135 x 68 x 9.5 144 x x72.3 x 9.5   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Red, Black, Gold, Blue Black and Gun, Latte Gold   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
0.71W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.89W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo Prime vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB Specs

Specs
Xolo PrimeXolo Era 2X 3GB  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Xolo Era 2X 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Useful fingerprint sensor embedded gestures
  • Decent overall performance
  • Reliance Jio (VoLTE) supported
The Bad
  • Big footprint despite a 5-inch display
  • Average display quality
  • Median camera output
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Prime with Xolo Era 2X 3GB. When you see Xolo Prime Vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Prime stands against Xolo Era 2X 3GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Prime is currently Rs. 14,999. The lowest price for Xolo Era 2X 3GB is Rs. 6,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page