Compare Xolo Q1000s Plus vs Intex Aqua Costa

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Xolo Q1000s Plus is the same as Intex Aqua Costa
  • The Xolo Q1000s Plus has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 75.0% more
  • Both Xolo Q1000s Plus and Intex Aqua Costa have same RAM
 
Xolo Q1000s Plus
Intex Aqua Costa
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53Value For Money
75Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 196 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589T MediaTek MT6580   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
BSI 2 Sensor, Scene Detection & Tuning, Low Light Enhancement, Geo Tagging, Vertical & Horizontal Panorama Capture HDR, Face Recognition Face detection, Digital Zoom   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
147 x 72.1 x 7.98 145 x 72 x 9.4   
Weight
- 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black White, Gold, Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase.   
Body SAR
0.56W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.58W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.49GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 WCDMA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Xolo Q1000s Plus vs Intex Aqua Costa Specs

Specs
Xolo Q1000s PlusIntex Aqua Costa  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Q1000s Plus with Intex Aqua Costa. When you see Xolo Q1000s Plus Vs Intex Aqua Costa comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Q1000s Plus stands against Intex Aqua Costa and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Costa is Rs. 3,998. The prices for both these products were updated January 18, 2018.

Get Rs. 5 for every unique specification mistake (or missing specs) that you point out via this form. Amount would be paid via Paytm. Enter your Paytm mobile number in the description box.

Report an error on this page