Compare Xolo Q1000s Plus vs Panasonic Eluga Arc

Feature Comparison

  • Xolo Q1000s Plus's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Panasonic Eluga Arc's 4.7 inch Screen Size
  • Xolo Q1000s Plus has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Xolo Q1000s Plus and Panasonic Eluga Arc have same RAM
 
Xolo Q1000s Plus
Panasonic Eluga Arc
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
45 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 312 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589T Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
BSI 2 Sensor, Scene Detection & Tuning, Low Light Enhancement, Geo Tagging, Vertical & Horizontal Panorama Capture HDR, Face Recognition Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
147 x 72.1 x 7.98 139 x 67 x 8.1   
Weight
- 130 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.56W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.58W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 1800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) -   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No Yes, Qualcomm Fast charging   

Xolo Q1000s Plus vs Panasonic Eluga Arc Specs

Specs
Xolo Q1000s PlusPanasonic Eluga Arc  
Screen Size 5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh1800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Q1000s Plus with Panasonic Eluga Arc. When you see Xolo Q1000s Plus Vs Panasonic Eluga Arc comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Q1000s Plus stands against Panasonic Eluga Arc and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Arc is Rs. 7,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page