Compare Xolo Q1200 vs LG G Flex 2

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on LG G Flex 2 is 9.0% more
  • The LG G Flex 2's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • The LG G Flex 2's RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Xolo Q1200
LG G Flex 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
57 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 430   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2.1MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Sony Exmor R Sensor Gesture Shot, Gesture View, and Soft Light, Dual LED Flash   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.8 x 71.4 x 6.9 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37   
Weight
- 152 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Silver, Red   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.45W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.31W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo Q1200 vs LG G Flex 2 Specs

Specs
Xolo Q1200LG G Flex 2  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2.1MP  

LG G Flex 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brilliant AMOLED display and sharp enough at 401PPI
  • Unique flexible display
  • Thanks to the curved display the phone sits well in the hands
  • Self healing back
  • Excellent performance with the Snapdragon 810 chipset
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Complains of heating issues when doing any memory intensive tasks
  • Images from the rear camera often look muted
  • Disappointing battery life when compared to its predecessor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Q1200 with LG G Flex 2. When you see Xolo Q1200 Vs LG G Flex 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Q1200 stands against LG G Flex 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Q1200 is currently Rs. 11,000. The lowest price for LG G Flex 2 is Rs. 16,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page