Compare Xolo Q1200 vs LG Stylus 2

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of LG Stylus 2's is 12.0% more than Xolo Q1200
  • LG Stylus 2's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The RAM on LG Stylus 2 is 50.0% more
 
Xolo Q1200
LG Stylus 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 257.65 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Sony Exmor R Sensor Touch focus, Face detection, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Scene mode, Self timer, Geotagging, Panorama, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.8 x 71.4 x 6.9 155 x 79.60 x 7.40   
Weight
- 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Titan, White, Brown   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.45W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.31W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.3GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Xolo Q1200 vs LG Stylus 2 Specs

Specs
Xolo Q1200LG Stylus 2  
Screen Size 5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

LG Stylus 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Runs on the latest Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
  • Decent battery life with the 3000mAh unit supplied
  • 4G connectivity with VoLTE support
The Bad
  • Below average display quality at just 258PPI
  • Average performance with Snapdragon 410 and 2GB of RAM
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging
  • Does not support 4k video recording

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Q1200 with LG Stylus 2. When you see Xolo Q1200 Vs LG Stylus 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Q1200 stands against LG Stylus 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Xolo Q1200 is currently Rs. 11,000. The lowest price for LG Stylus 2 is Rs. 12,590. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page