Compare Xolo Q2100 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Xolo Q2100's is 9.0% more than Panasonic Eluga Ray
  • Panasonic Eluga Ray's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Panasonic Eluga Ray has 66.0% more RAM
 
Xolo Q2100
Panasonic Eluga Ray
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
54 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
67 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Scene Detection, High Dynamic Range (HDR), Low Light Enhancement, Face Recognition, Vertical & Horizontal Panorama Capture, Geo Tagging HDR, Continuous shooting, Touch focus, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, Face detection, Geotagging, White balance settings, Panorama, Self timer, ISO settings, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.4 x 75 x 9.3 144.4 x 71.6 x 9.7   
Weight
- 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gold, Rose Gold, Space Gray   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
0.56W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.68W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Xolo Q2100 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray Specs

Specs
Xolo Q2100Panasonic Eluga Ray  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Q2100 with Panasonic Eluga Ray. When you see Xolo Q2100 Vs Panasonic Eluga Ray comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Q2100 stands against Panasonic Eluga Ray and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Ray is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page