Compare Xolo Win Q900s vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee F103 3GB RAM's is 5.0% more than Xolo Win Q900s
  • Gionee F103 3GB RAM has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Gionee F103 3GB RAM's is 66.0% more than Xolo Win Q900s
 
Xolo Win Q900s
Gionee F103 3GB RAM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
26 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
PureCel(TM) Sensor Geo-tagging, Autofocus, Macro Mode, Continuous Shooting, Digital Zoom, Digital Image Stabilization, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 Amigo 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
135.8 x 67.2 x 7.2 143 x 70.3 x 7.95   
Weight
100 grams 136 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, White   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.49GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Xolo Win Q900s vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM Specs

Specs
Xolo Win Q900sGionee F103 3GB RAM  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Gionee F103 3GB RAM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Lightweight Design
The Bad
  • Average Camera Output
  • Average Performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Xolo Win Q900s with Gionee F103 3GB RAM. When you see Xolo Win Q900s Vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Xolo Win Q900s stands against Gionee F103 3GB RAM and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Gionee F103 3GB RAM is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page