Compare Yu Yureka vs Lenovo Phab 2

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo Phab 2's is 14.0% more than Yu Yureka
  • The Lenovo Phab 2's got 32GB Internal Storage, while Yu Yureka's Internal Storage is 16GB
  • Lenovo Phab 2 has 3GB RAM and Yu Yureka has 2GB RAM
 
Yu Yureka
Lenovo Phab 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 229 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT8735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
154.8 x 78 x 6-8.8 175 x 89.5 x 5.5   
Weight
155 grams 225 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, White Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes, (Uses SIM2 slot)   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Yu Yureka vs Lenovo Phab 2 Specs

Specs
Yu YurekaLenovo Phab 2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy & classy build quality
The Bad
  • Low pixel density
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • Mediocre camera

Yu Yureka Pros & Cons

The Good
  • CyanogenMod brings a ton of customizations
  • Smooth performer in day to day tasks with no visible stutter
  • Removable back panel and battery
  • Matt finishing on the back cover provides excellent grip
The Bad
  • The home button has no backlight
  • Tends to heat up when playing games
  • Low light shots from the rear camera have a lot of noise

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Yu Yureka with Lenovo Phab 2. When you see Yu Yureka Vs Lenovo Phab 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Yu Yureka stands against Lenovo Phab 2 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page