Compare Yu Yureka vs Vivo Y55L

Feature Comparison

  • Yu Yureka has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Vivo Y55L has 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • Both Yu Yureka and Vivo Y55L have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Yu Yureka is the same as Vivo Y55L
 
Yu Yureka
Vivo Y55L
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) Funtouch OS 2.6   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
154.8 x 78 x 6-8.8 147.9 x 72.9 x 7.5   
Weight
155 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, White Gold, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.767W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.224W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12GB 8.86GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 900   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) D-LTE 2100 / 1800 / 850 / 2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2650mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Yu Yureka vs Vivo Y55L Specs

Specs
Yu YurekaVivo Y55L  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2650mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Yu Yureka Pros & Cons

The Good
  • CyanogenMod brings a ton of customizations
  • Smooth performer in day to day tasks with no visible stutter
  • Removable back panel and battery
  • Matt finishing on the back cover provides excellent grip
The Bad
  • The home button has no backlight
  • Tends to heat up when playing games
  • Low light shots from the rear camera have a lot of noise

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Yu Yureka with Vivo Y55L. When you see Yu Yureka Vs Vivo Y55L comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Yu Yureka stands against Vivo Y55L and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y55L is Rs. 11,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page