Compare Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD vs Xolo Era 2X

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD is the same as Xolo Era 2X
  • Both Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD and Xolo Era 2X have same Internal Storage
  • The Xolo Era 2X's RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD
Xolo Era 2X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
53 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 297 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 2 -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Auto Focus Rear Camera with 5P Largan Lens, F2.0, Blue Glass Filter, Face Beauty, HDR, Panorama, Gesture Recognition, Voice Capture, Smile Shot, Face Detection, Self Timer, Time Lapse Video   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 144 x x72.3 x 9.5   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black and Gun, Latte Gold   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2050mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD vs Xolo Era 2X Specs

Specs
Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHDXolo Era 2X  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2050mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Xolo Era 2X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Useful fingerprint sensor embedded gestures
  • Decent overall performance
  • Reliance Jio (VoLTE) supported
The Bad
  • Big footprint despite a 5-inch display
  • Average display quality
  • Median camera output
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD with Xolo Era 2X. When you see Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD Vs Xolo Era 2X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Zen Ultrafone AMAZE 701FHD stands against Xolo Era 2X and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Xolo Era 2X is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page