Compare Zopo Color C vs Xolo Era 2X

Feature Comparison

  • Xolo Era 2X has 5 inch Screen Size, whereas Zopo Color C has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Xolo Era 2X's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Xolo Era 2X's 2GB RAM is more than Zopo Color C's 1GB RAM
 
Zopo Color C
Xolo Era 2X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
50 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 297 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Auto Focus Rear Camera with 5P Largan Lens, F2.0, Blue Glass Filter, Face Beauty, HDR, Panorama, Gesture Recognition, Voice Capture, Smile Shot, Face Detection, Self Timer, Time Lapse Video   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133 x 65.7 x 8.5 144 x x72.3 x 9.5   
Weight
133 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Blue, Yellow, Black, Red Black and Gun, Latte Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1700mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Zopo Color C vs Xolo Era 2X Specs

Specs
Zopo Color CXolo Era 2X  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1700mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Xolo Era 2X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Useful fingerprint sensor embedded gestures
  • Decent overall performance
  • Reliance Jio (VoLTE) supported
The Bad
  • Big footprint despite a 5-inch display
  • Average display quality
  • Median camera output
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Zopo Color C with Xolo Era 2X. When you see Zopo Color C Vs Xolo Era 2X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Zopo Color C stands against Xolo Era 2X and which one you should buy. The best price of Zopo Color C is currently Rs. 3,900. The lowest price for Xolo Era 2X is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page